Indiana Bankruptcy Lawyer Mark Zuckerberg Sues Meta CEO Over Impersonation Claims
Key Points
- Indiana bankruptcy lawyer Mark Zuckerberg files lawsuit against Meta CEO.
- Meta’s platform disabled his Facebook page multiple times for alleged impersonation.
- He spent over $11,000 on ads that were removed after the disablements.
- The lawyer has been practicing since the tech founder was three years old.
- The lawsuit seeks compensation and an injunction to stop future wrongful takedowns.
A bankruptcy lawyer named Mark Zuckerberg from Indiana has filed a lawsuit against Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, alleging that Meta’s platform repeatedly disabled his commercial Facebook page for falsely labeling him as an impersonator. The lawyer, who has been practicing law since the tech founder was three years old, says the disablements have cost him advertising dollars and disrupted his practice. He seeks relief for the alleged wrongful actions and highlights the broader issue of name-based misidentification on social media platforms.
Background
Mark Zuckerberg, a bankruptcy attorney based in Indiana, uses a commercial Facebook page to promote his legal services and attract clients. Over the past several years, Meta’s moderation systems have disabled the page multiple times, flagging it as an impersonation of the Meta founder, also named Mark Zuckerberg. The lawyer argues that, because he shares the lawyer’s exact name, the platform’s automated filters mistakenly treat his legitimate page as fraudulent.
Legal Complaint
In the filed lawsuit, the Indiana attorney alleges that Meta’s repeated disabling of his page has caused financial losses, including more than $11,000 spent on advertising that was later removed. He points to a 2020 email thread showing his attempts to resolve the issue with Meta’s support teams. The complaint seeks compensation for the advertising costs and an injunction to prevent future wrongful disablements.
Implications
The case highlights the challenges faced by individuals who share names with high‑profile public figures when using social‑media platforms for professional purposes. It also raises questions about the accuracy of automated impersonation detection tools and the due‑process rights of legitimate account holders. Meta has not publicly responded to the lawsuit, but the dispute underscores broader concerns about name‑based misidentification on digital platforms.